Al Franken, Filibuster Buster

July 5th, 2009

Now that the Minnesota Supreme Court has resolved the Franken-Coleman election dispute, Al Franken will take his seat as the junior Senator from Minnesota, presumably during the coming week.

There’s a lot of talk about the Democrats having a filibuster-proof 60-vote supermajority with Franken in the Senate.  The fact is, it’s a pretty shaky supermajority. 

Of the 60 senators in the Senate Democratic Caucus, Senator Bernie Sanders and Senator Joe Lieberman are both independents, and Lieberman in particular often doesn’t follow the party line.  Newly-minted Democrat Arlen Specter will go where his conscience takes him.  Senator Robert Byrd and Senator Ted Kennedy are both ill and frequently miss votes.

It’s been said many times that organizing and leading senators is like herding cats.  There are Democratic senators who don’t necessarily support some of President Obama’s programs, and there are Republicans who might support them now and then — Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, and perhaps a few others.  So on any given Senate action needing a 60-vote majority, which is most of them these days, there will likely be some Democrats and some Republicans who cross the aisle.  That won’t always give the Democrats the votes they need.

What this means is that the President and the Democratic leadership in the Senate can’t push Republicans around too much without risking the loss of defectors they’re going to need fairly frequently.  They also have to moderate some of their initiatives to keep the moderate Democrats in line.

Here’s how David Broder put it in The Limits of 60 Votes in The Washington Post:

Franken, the loud-mouthed former comedian, will be the 60th member of the Senate Democratic caucus — just enough for them to cut off any filibuster threat if they can muster all their members. With solid majorities in both houses, the Democratic leaders, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, could dismiss Republican objections to any bill without a second thought.

Yet that would not only contradict President Obama’s promise to change the partisan climate in Washington but would also entail unnecessary risks to Obama’s ambitious policy goals.

Many who have heard Republican leaders in Congress proclaim their opposition to almost every piece of Obama’s program are saying, “To hell with them.” Instead of seeking to enlist Republican support, they urge Obama to tailor everything to the wishes of his Democratic allies.

Yet when it comes to the big initiatives — energy, health care and the rest — the risks of such a choice are obvious. When no Republican votes are in play, the price individual Democratic legislators can extract from the White House goes up. We saw plenty of that with the stimulus bill and the energy bill, both of which were weakened substantively by the concessions Obama had to make to get the last Democratic votes.

Al Franken’s presence in the Senate isn’t actually going to make that much difference.  The bipartisanship and “change” President Obama talked about during the campaign hasn’t happened.  Democrats vilify Republicans at every turn and completely cut them out when possible, greasing-up only the few who might defect on the next vote.  Republicans mostly sit back and obstruct everything they can, blabbing mindlessly about the threat of socialism and the impending destruction of the free market.  Most — Democrats and Republicans alike — don’t seem to care that much about what’s good for the country.

(For anyone who may be curious about why the Senate can’t act without 60 votes instead of the required simple majority, there’s a good discussion at Wikipedia.)


Articles written by
Tags: , ,
Categories: News, Politics | Comments (1) | Home


Bookmark and Share


One Response to “Al Franken, Filibuster Buster”



  1. Kevin |

    Tom,

    It is good to read your writing again. You as always have hit the nail on the head. Keep up the good work.

    Kev


Leave a Reply













Authors

Recent Posts



  

"I’ll be shocked if there’s another book this year as important as Charles Murray’s 'Coming Apart' ... that so compellingly describes the most important trends in American society. " -- David Brooks, NYT



Categories


Archives


Meta

Blogroll



Creative Commons License;   

The work on Opinion Forum   
is licensed under a   
Creative Commons Attribution   
3.0 Unported License
.    






Support Military Families 



Recent Comments 

  • Dan Miller: It’s not going to be at all easy and that’s why I would much prefer unity to...
  • Tom Carter: It’s not likely to be as easy to defeat Obama as some may think. He has the power of...
  • Dan Miller: Thanks, Larry I found it a bit painful to write, but with help from the stuff in the first...
  • larry: Well said brother Dan. As you point out,like it or not, we need to unite behind Romney. The...
  • Tom Carter: I see the logic. I really do, and that worries me. And the video shows why a lot of people...
  • Tom Carter: I remember the Edsel very well, and the much maligned Studebaker, too. I guess one has to...
  • Anonymous: It’s sad to see how barbaric these Islamic Palestinians really are. Even sadder is...
  • bea woods: My husband served in vietnam in 1968-1969 he was diagnoised with melanoma in 1998 we filed...
  • Anonymous: Very good articles. I found myself within your examples of people and their fear of change....
  • Tom Carter: This was a truly horrendous mass murder, made much worse by the praise Palestinians (and...
  • Tom Carter: I used to teach courses and seminars on business management, and one of the topics...
  • Dan Miller: Thanks, Tom. “We report, you decide.” You say, without TOTUS we get the long...












My Zimbio  

Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory   Listed in LS Blogs the Blog Directory and Blog Search Engine

   blogarama - the blog directory

Politics Blog Directory   Yellow Pages for Austin, TX

Demand Media


Copyright 2012 Opinion Forum