Obama’s Strategic Mistakes
November 28th, 2009
By Harvey Grund
Fred Barnes, a conservative political commentator for Fox News and the editor of the Weekly Standard magazine, wrote a straight factual piece in the Wall Street Journal that details Why Obama Isn’t Changing Washington.
To start with, Barnes reviews the President’s statements when campaigning for office:
“Change must come to Washington,” Mr. Obama said in a June 2008 speech. “I have consistently said when it comes to solving problems,” he told Jake Tapper of ABC News that same month, “I don’t approach this from a partisan or ideological perspective.”
Mr. Obama also decried the prominent role played by lobbyists. “Lobbyists aren’t just a part of the system in Washington, they’re part of the problem,” Mr. Obama said in a May 2008 campaign speech.
What happened? Obama and his Democratic majority have gone so far as to change the locks on doors so that Republicans couldn’t get into sessions when the health care legislation was being drafted. Hardly partisan politics.
As for lobbyists, Barnes points out:
The bigger the role of government, the more lobbyists flock to town. By pushing for his policies, the president effectively put up a welcome sign to lobbyists. Despite promising to keep them out of his administration, he has even hired a few.
To answer his own question, “Why Obama Isn’t Changing Washington,” Barnes says that:
… the president made three strategic mistakes (or, really, misreadings of the political landscape) and they’ve come back to haunt him and his party.
First, Mr. Obama misread the meaning of the 2008 election. It wasn’t a mandate for a liberal revolution. His victory was a personal one, not an ideological triumph of liberalism. …
Second, Mr. Obama misread his own ability to sway the public. … The president spent much of the summer and early fall touting his health-care initiative. He spoke at town halls, appeared on five Sunday talk shows the same day (Sept. 20), turned up on “The Late Show with David Letterman” and on “60 Minutes.” All the while, support for ObamaCare fell. His address to Congress on health care on Sept. 9 is now remembered only for Republican Rep. Joe Wilson’s shouted accusation, “You lie!”
Third, Mr. Obama misread Republicans. They felt weak and vulnerable after losing two straight congressional elections and watching John McCain’s presidential bid fall flat. They were afraid to criticize the newly elected president. If he had offered them minimal concessions, many of them would have jumped aboard his policies. If that had happened, the president could have boasted of achieving bipartisan compromise on the stimulus and other policies. He let the chance slip away.
I would add that Obama’s worst mistake was his assumption that Americans are willing to give up the America they know and love for an America with a government that overwhelms their lives with taxes and with rules and regulations that take away their ability to make their own decisions.
(This article was also posted at My View from the Center.)
Articles written by Harvey Grund
Tags: Fred Barnes, mistakes, Obama
Categories: News, Politics | Comments (3) | Home
3 Responses to “Obama’s Strategic Mistakes”
Leave a Reply
Authors
Recent Posts
- Is Governor Romney an Edsel Republican?
- Five Steps to Positive Life Change (and the Big Payoff!)
- Murderers of the Fogel Family in Israel Are Heroes
- The Church and the Holocaust
- Auschwitz and the Holocaust
- Remembering the Holocaust
- Why Corporate Change is Difficult, But Possible
- Fatigue Is a Parent’s Worst Enemy (and Constant Companion)
- Confesssion: I Did Not Watch the SOTU Last Night
- After the State of the Union: Who Can Defeat Obama?
- Let’s All Vote for President Obama
- Five Building Blocks of Positive Life Change
- Get Ready for Higher Gas Prices
- Success Is Great!
- We need a Reasonable Everything Board (REB)
- Pros and Cons of the U.S. Higher Education System
- Enlightened Self-interest and International Relations
- Four Obstacles to Positive Life Change
- The Republican Marathon Is Distracting and Dangerous
- Should Politics and Foreign Policy Affect Our Military Justice System?
"I’ll be shocked if there’s another book this year as important as Charles Murray’s 'Coming Apart' ... that so compellingly describes the most important trends in American society. " -- David Brooks, NYT
Categories
Archives
Meta
Blogroll
- BLACKFIVE
- BlueOregon
- Booman Tribune
- Clarissa's Blog
- Crooked Timber
- Crooks and Liars
- Crossroads Arabia
- Daily Kos
- Dan Miller's Blog
- Democratic Underground
- Donklephant
- Dr. Jim Taylor
- Dr. Jim Taylor's Blog
- Earth Legacy
- EarthAirWater
- Global Voices Online
- Henry David Thoreau’s Blog
- Hot Air
- Instapundit
- Iowahawk
- Iraq Today
- Jack Jacobs
- Jan Barry
- Letters from an Ohio Farmer
- Little Green Footballs
- Matthew Yglesias
- Michelle Malkin
- Mr. Forman's Planet
- Mudville Gazette
- Newsvine Politics
- No Oil for Pacifists
- Outside the Beltway
- Pajamas Media
- Patterico’s Pontifications
- PJ Tatler
- Powerline
- Right Bias
- Talking Points Memo
- The Accidental Humanist
- The Becker-Posner Blog
- The Huffington Post Politics
- The Huffington Post Pollster
- The Long War Journal
- The Moderate Voice
- The Sandbox
- The UN Post
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- TVNewser
- Watching America
- White House Blog
- Wind Rose Hotel
- Wizbang
- Wonkette
;Recent Comments
- Tom Carter: I remember the Edsel very well, and the much maligned Studebaker, too. I guess one has to...
- Anonymous: It’s sad to see how barbaric these Islamic Palestinians really are. Even sadder is...
- bea woods: My husband served in vietnam in 1968-1969 he was diagnoised with melanoma in 1998 we filed...
- Anonymous: Very good articles. I found myself within your examples of people and their fear of change....
- Tom Carter: This was a truly horrendous mass murder, made much worse by the praise Palestinians (and...
- Tom Carter: I used to teach courses and seminars on business management, and one of the topics...
- Dan Miller: Thanks, Tom. “We report, you decide.” You say, without TOTUS we get the long...
- Tom Carter: Well done, Dan! Clearly a fair and balanced report. It’s obvious, however, that your...
- larry: Are you guys sure this isn’t some sort of deep dark conspiracy?
- Dan Miller: Tom, Caruso? Ha! His weak voice and shoddy choice of music then were as nothing compared...
- Tom Carter: I have to admit, I was disgruntled before I read this brilliant article. It gave me the...
- Dan Miller: Larry No, that would be unfair. However, I am less than totally gruntled. Dan
Harvey, I agree with you on all points. And I always agree with Fred Barnes. Perhaps the most insightful point is that Obama’s victory in 2008 wasn’t a mandate for a revolution, it was a personal victory for the man himself and what people thought he was. I still have hopes that he can find his bearings and bring all his impressive intelligence into play, and I want him to be a successful president, for the benefit of the country.
People keep talking about how intelligent “his impressive intelligence” Obama is. Okay, he has a degree from Harvard. Does anyone know his GPA from that school? We know that while he was editor of Harvard Law Review, he did not write anything and was only a figure head in that position. Thus far, the only thing I’ve noticed that Barack Obama can do better than George Bush is read a teleprompter. An intelligent person is someone who can process complex information. A strong leader is someone who is intelligent and has a vision, exercises good judgment, is decisive and is consistent among other things. So what do we have here, and what will tomorrow bring?
Lisa, by all indications he is very intelligent. But the additional characteristics you listed as part of being a good leader…well, that’s something else. I think the jury’s still out on all that, but we may get a pretty good indication on Tuesday when he announces his Afghanistan decision.