Terrorism and Priorities
February 2nd, 2010
By Tom Carter
Richard Cohen, normally a pragmatic liberal who supports President Obama, has taken him and his Administration to task on how they’re dealing with terrorists. From his column in The Washington Post today:
There is almost nothing the Obama administration does regarding terrorism that makes me feel safer. Whether it is guaranteeing captured terrorists that they will not be waterboarded, reciting terrorists their rights, or the legally meandering and confusing rule that some terrorists will be tried in military tribunals and some in civilian courts, what is missing is a firm recognition that what comes first is not the message sent to America’s critics but the message sent to Americans themselves. When, oh when, will this administration wake up?
On related issues:
The announced closing of Guantanamo has also suffered from a peculiar Obama-style naivete. It is now apparent that there are some bad people there who should be detained way past the time they are eligible for AARP membership. It’s true that the world does not like Guantanamo, but then it’s also true that the world is not an al-Qaeda target. …
No doubt George Bush soiled America’s image abroad with what looked liked vigilante justice and Dick Cheney’s hearty endorsement of ugly interrogation measures. But more is at stake here than America’s image abroad — namely the security and peace of mind of Americans in America. Bush stands condemned by the facts for Sept. 11 — his watch, his responsibility — and in all likelihood he bent over backward to ensure that nothing like those attacks would happen again.
The Obama administration, on the other hand, seems to have bent over backward to prove to the world it is not the Bush administration and will, almost no matter what, ensure that everyone gets the benefit of American civil liberties. But the paramount civil liberty is a sense of security and this, sad to say, has eroded under Barack Obama. Repeatedly, the administration has shown poor judgment.
President Obama should be paying attention — this isn’t some typical Republican conservative criticizing his Administration and its policies. More and more, common-sense liberals are joining in the criticism. It doesn’t take a psychic to foretell the future if things don’t change, and soon.
Articles written by Tom Carter
Tags: Abdulmutallab, criminal trials, Guantanamo, KSM, Obama, security
Categories: News, Politics | Comments (4) | Home
4 Responses to “Terrorism and Priorities”
Leave a Reply
Authors
Recent Posts
- I Do Not Like Thee, Governor Romney
- Anthroprogenic Global Warming Gave Us President Obama
- Is Governor Romney an Edsel Republican?
- Five Steps to Positive Life Change (and the Big Payoff!)
- Murderers of the Fogel Family in Israel Are Heroes
- The Church and the Holocaust
- Auschwitz and the Holocaust
- Remembering the Holocaust
- Why Corporate Change is Difficult, But Possible
- Fatigue Is a Parent’s Worst Enemy (and Constant Companion)
- Confesssion: I Did Not Watch the SOTU Last Night
- After the State of the Union: Who Can Defeat Obama?
- Let’s All Vote for President Obama
- Five Building Blocks of Positive Life Change
- Get Ready for Higher Gas Prices
- Success Is Great!
- We need a Reasonable Everything Board (REB)
- Pros and Cons of the U.S. Higher Education System
- Enlightened Self-interest and International Relations
- Four Obstacles to Positive Life Change
"I’ll be shocked if there’s another book this year as important as Charles Murray’s 'Coming Apart' ... that so compellingly describes the most important trends in American society. " -- David Brooks, NYT
Categories
Archives
Meta
Blogroll
- BLACKFIVE
- BlueOregon
- Booman Tribune
- Clarissa's Blog
- Crooked Timber
- Crooks and Liars
- Crossroads Arabia
- Daily Kos
- Dan Miller's Blog
- Democratic Underground
- Donklephant
- Dr. Jim Taylor
- Dr. Jim Taylor's Blog
- Earth Legacy
- EarthAirWater
- Global Voices Online
- Henry David Thoreau’s Blog
- Hot Air
- Instapundit
- Iowahawk
- Iraq Today
- Jack Jacobs
- Jan Barry
- Letters from an Ohio Farmer
- Little Green Footballs
- Matthew Yglesias
- Michelle Malkin
- Mr. Forman's Planet
- Mudville Gazette
- Newsvine Politics
- No Oil for Pacifists
- Outside the Beltway
- Pajamas Media
- Patterico’s Pontifications
- PJ Tatler
- Powerline
- Right Bias
- Talking Points Memo
- The Accidental Humanist
- The Becker-Posner Blog
- The Huffington Post Politics
- The Huffington Post Pollster
- The Long War Journal
- The Moderate Voice
- The Sandbox
- The UN Post
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- TVNewser
- Watching America
- White House Blog
- Wind Rose Hotel
- Wizbang
- Wonkette
;Recent Comments
- Dan Miller: It’s not going to be at all easy and that’s why I would much prefer unity to...
- Tom Carter: It’s not likely to be as easy to defeat Obama as some may think. He has the power of...
- Dan Miller: Thanks, Larry I found it a bit painful to write, but with help from the stuff in the first...
- larry: Well said brother Dan. As you point out,like it or not, we need to unite behind Romney. The...
- Tom Carter: I see the logic. I really do, and that worries me. And the video shows why a lot of people...
- Tom Carter: I remember the Edsel very well, and the much maligned Studebaker, too. I guess one has to...
- Anonymous: It’s sad to see how barbaric these Islamic Palestinians really are. Even sadder is...
- bea woods: My husband served in vietnam in 1968-1969 he was diagnoised with melanoma in 1998 we filed...
- Anonymous: Very good articles. I found myself within your examples of people and their fear of change....
- Tom Carter: This was a truly horrendous mass murder, made much worse by the praise Palestinians (and...
- Tom Carter: I used to teach courses and seminars on business management, and one of the topics...
- Dan Miller: Thanks, Tom. “We report, you decide.” You say, without TOTUS we get the long...
http://slatest.slate.com/id/2243369/?wpisrc=newsletter
Beware of Richard Cohen. He is a charter neocon who was smart enough to shift a bit, before the others.
(I do not use the term “neocon” indiscriminately, as do so many today. I refer to the disciples of Leo Strauss (Krystol, Perl, Wolfowitz, …)
Bob, you’re characterizing Cohen as a neocon in the same way all leftist liberals use the word — those who disagree with liberals on key issues, to include Iraq, are, ipso facto, neoconservatives. Horse puckey.
I’ve read Cohen for many, many years, and I know a bit about his background. He is, as I described him in the article, a pragmatic liberal who supports President Obama. The operative word is “pragmatic.” He’s open-minded enough to disagree with liberals when he thinks they’re wrong, regardless of what the laundry list of liberal orthodoxy may demand. He’s also capable of making mistakes, just like you and me, and he’s capable of changing his mind.
I have to tell you, my friend, that as more and more Democrats turn against Obama, both because of his poor performance and because they want to survive politically, you’re going to wear out the word “neocon.”
Tom,
I took care to say that I know what “neo-con” means. I do not use that word indiscriminately. I repeat that Richard Cohen was one of them before taking some distance.
Don’t misunderstand — I generally find his articles worth reading. But I always keep in mind the neo-con philosophy, and therefore that Cohen may or may not be writing what he really thinks. He may or may not be setting up a straw man, a Trojan Horse, …
As they say, caveat emptor…