A Forum for Opinions on News, Politics, and Life
February 1st, 2012
By Dan Miller
Remember the Ford Edsel? A really spiffy new car with a two-tone paint job, lots of chrome and an unfortunate distraction in front? The Edsel in no manner resembles either the Republican party of today or its favored candidate; perish all such heretical conservative thoughts lest you be deemed a Tea Party Terrorist.
The Edsel was introduced amid considerable publicity on “E Day”—September 4, 1957. It was also promoted by a top-rated television special, The Edsel Show, on October 13, but the promotional effort was not enough to counter the adverse initial public reaction to the car’s styling and conventional build. For months, Ford had been circulating rumors that led people to expect an entirely new kind of car, when in reality, the Edsel shared its engineering and bodywork with other Ford models.
Governor Romney, who (we have been assured, repeatedly) will be the Republican presidential nominee this year, can not realistically even be presented as new, different and more exciting than President Obama. He is just not quite Obama; merely Obama Lite.
Perhaps the Edsel would have been better received had its advertisements merely claimed “It’s not a Studebaker.” In all of his mundane glory Governor Romney, like the Edsel, has been offered to a disappointed public hoping for something new, different and better — a big change from the dull and boring cars of the past. Sold only in 1958 (68,045), 1959 (47,396) and 1960 (2,846), the Edsel flopped (I have seen no reports, however, of it having frequently flipped).
Historians have advanced several theories in an effort to explain the Edsel’s failure. Popular culture often faults the car’s styling. Consumer Reports has alleged that poor workmanship was the Edsel’s chief problem. Marketing experts hold the Edsel up as a supreme example of the corporate culture’s failure to understand American consumers. Business analysts cite the weak internal support for the product inside Ford’s executive offices. According to author and Edsel scholar Jan Deutsch, the Edsel was “the wrong car at the wrong time.”
Governor Romney had the best advertising money could buy in Florida. Have the Republican (as distinguished, if such a distinction is credible, from Governor Romney’s) marketing experts failed to understand consumers or have the foolish consumers failed to understand that what’s best for the party leaders is also best for the rest of us? Have the denizens of the Republican executive offices failed to understand what Republicans want and can vote for with enthusiasm? Not that enthusiasm is important, of course, but still…. Poor workmanship, such as “I’m not concerned about the very poor?” Nah, those were only ill-chosen words spoken in the heat of the Florida victory and besides he didn’t say (again) that he likes to
eat fire people. True, as the linked article observes, headlines will take his words out of the context in which they made at least some sense (mainly to those who hope to continue and expand the welfare state, a great post-partisan talking point); however, as a mere Washington outsider and not even a career politician, Governor Romney could not possibly have anticipated that sort of reporting. It’s already happening, all over the place. Couldn’t he at least have claimed that he considered the very poor interesting?
In 2007, the Edsel had the honor of being named the twelfth worst car in American history.
That’s why we’re all here, right? To celebrate E Day, the date 50 years ago when Ford took one of the autodom’s most hilarious pratfalls. But why? It really wasn’t that bad a car. True, the car was kind of homely, fuel thirsty and too expensive, particularly at the outset of the late ’50s recession. But what else? It was the first victim of Madison Avenue hyper-hype. Ford’s marketing mavens had led the public to expect some plutonium-powered, pancake-making wondercar; what they got was a Mercury. Cultural critics speculated that the car was a flop because the vertical grill looked like a vagina. Maybe. America in the ’50s was certainly phobic about the female business. How did the Edsel come to be synonymous with failure? All of the above, consolidated into an irrational groupthink and pressurized by a joyously catty media.
I remember an old joke about the least lucky person in modern times: a pregnant prostitute driving an Edsel with a Nixon sticker. Is Governor Romney an Edsel? Of course not. He is not an automobile and has not yet claimed to be one. Beyond that, he does not claim to be an exciting new model or even The One® we’ve been waiting for. Moreover, his marketing has been different from that used in the Edsel introduction.
The slick marketing campaign built a lot of anticipation around the Edsel’s release by only showing the car through unfocused lenses and thin, gauzy sheets. Buuuut, again, like above, no one knew what the hell the Edsel was supposed to be. Also the name is ugly as sin.
There have been no “unfocused lenses and thin, gauzy sheets” to build up excitement for Governor Romney; they have been used only to obfuscate his conflicting positions. While his inconsistencies have blurred what he stands for to the point that no one (maybe not even Governor Romney himself) knows who or what the real Governor Romney is, there has been something for nearly everyone so everyone should be pleased with him. Right? He resembles
RomneyCare ObamaCare — we have to pass it elect him to find out what’s in it him, away from the fog of controversy; controversy is terribly confusing and therefore bad and so are those who create it.
That may work. We will probably nominate and maybe even elect him. I guess I will vote for him if there is no viable option because he was the choice of my betters. Then, perhaps we will learn, through his actions rather than his words, what’s in him and what’s in store for the rest of us.
Some of us may enjoy being caged on top of the Romney Mobile and treated to lots of
hot fresh air. It might well be an improvement over the present stuffy but chilly atmosphere in Washington.
Leading the way
In any event, the views on top will be breathtaking and Former First Dog Bo may become insanely jealous when President Romney’s dog gets to ride in a crate atop Air Force One.
(This article was also posted at Dan Miller’s Blog.)
(To avoid spam, comments with three or more links will be held for moderation and approval.)
Copyright 2016 Opinion Forum