A Forum for Opinions on News, Politics, and Life
May 6th, 2013
By Dan Miller
Sorry, I meant Daily Beast. It must have been a Freudian slip. Or something.
There is an article on the Benghazi cover-up at the Daily Beast. It’s not badly done, but read the comments. They are hilarious, if one has a warped sense of humor. Many (perhaps most, but I have difficulty counting that high) support what they refer to affectionately as “our next President, Hillary Clinton” (may her
holy mendacious name be praised) and take the position that their savior, President Obama, can do and has done nothing wrong.
No matter how diligently the RINO party tries to assemble a politically correct and hence diverse big tent, it cannot encompass such ideologies as evidenced by the Daily Beast readers who bothered to comment, without thereby excluding conservatives. Here are two relevant articles at Nebraska Energy Observer: The Conservative Predicament and The wrath of the awakening Saxon. I agree.
Where should we go from here? Waking up seems as though it should a good first step. After, of course, we get rid of the body snatchers and snatchees.
It isn’t just Senator Rubio, as Bill Whittle points out quite effectively. As noted at The wrath of the awakening Saxon,
In the UK and the USA the old parties seem irrelevant – vehicles for career politicians who don’t care which team they drive for as long as it is the winning one. And out here, beyond the Thunderdome, we’re beginning to see that whoever else wins, we lose.
We The RINO Party must enjoy losing and does it with great competence.
(This article was also posted at Dan Miller’s Blog.)
(To avoid spam, comments with three or more links will be held for moderation and approval.)
Copyright 2016 Opinion Forum