Good Old Harry
November 21st, 2009
By Larry Ennis
As the time to vote for health care reform in the Senate speedily comes this way, we start to see and hear of different little sweetheart deals being cut by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and others to insure the passage of one of Obama’s favorites.
One of the principle holdouts in getting enough votes to pass the bill has been Senator Mary Landrieu (photo at left), Democrat from Louisiana. Her price to support Harry Reid is an extra $100,000,000 for her home state. Quite a bit more than the price of a small chicken, in fact more than we paid France for the whole Louisiana territory. I can’t blame Ms. Landrieu; she is taking advantage of this legislation to reap double benefits for her home state. Yet this is only one example what’s being done to pass this bill.
Louisiana, like Illinois, is known for the political corruption that it lets run rampant. How much of this $100 million will ever reach the voters in Landrieu’s state is unknown, but I can pretty much guess.
One bizarre aspect this screwy mess is the timing that is set to keep the true cost of this health care reform fiasco under wraps until 2014. Just look at it as a landmine waiting to explode.
One last thought. If there are 40 million people without health care insurance, why can’t we give each of them a million of Ms. Landrieu’s dollars for health care and save the other 60 million or use it for ticket money to bring our troops home?
Articles written by Larry Ennis
Tags: health care reform, Landrieu, Louisiana, Reid, Senate
Categories: Economics, News, Politics | Comments (11) | Home
11 Responses to “Good Old Harry”
Leave a Reply
Authors
Recent Posts
- Is Governor Romney an Edsel Republican?
- Five Steps to Positive Life Change (and the Big Payoff!)
- Murderers of the Fogel Family in Israel Are Heroes
- The Church and the Holocaust
- Auschwitz and the Holocaust
- Remembering the Holocaust
- Why Corporate Change is Difficult, But Possible
- Fatigue Is a Parent’s Worst Enemy (and Constant Companion)
- Confesssion: I Did Not Watch the SOTU Last Night
- After the State of the Union: Who Can Defeat Obama?
- Let’s All Vote for President Obama
- Five Building Blocks of Positive Life Change
- Get Ready for Higher Gas Prices
- Success Is Great!
- We need a Reasonable Everything Board (REB)
- Pros and Cons of the U.S. Higher Education System
- Enlightened Self-interest and International Relations
- Four Obstacles to Positive Life Change
- The Republican Marathon Is Distracting and Dangerous
- Should Politics and Foreign Policy Affect Our Military Justice System?
"I’ll be shocked if there’s another book this year as important as Charles Murray’s 'Coming Apart' ... that so compellingly describes the most important trends in American society. " -- David Brooks, NYT
Categories
Archives
Meta
Blogroll
- BLACKFIVE
- BlueOregon
- Booman Tribune
- Clarissa's Blog
- Crooked Timber
- Crooks and Liars
- Crossroads Arabia
- Daily Kos
- Dan Miller's Blog
- Democratic Underground
- Donklephant
- Dr. Jim Taylor
- Dr. Jim Taylor's Blog
- Earth Legacy
- EarthAirWater
- Global Voices Online
- Henry David Thoreau’s Blog
- Hot Air
- Instapundit
- Iowahawk
- Iraq Today
- Jack Jacobs
- Jan Barry
- Letters from an Ohio Farmer
- Little Green Footballs
- Matthew Yglesias
- Michelle Malkin
- Mr. Forman's Planet
- Mudville Gazette
- Newsvine Politics
- No Oil for Pacifists
- Outside the Beltway
- Pajamas Media
- Patterico’s Pontifications
- PJ Tatler
- Powerline
- Right Bias
- Talking Points Memo
- The Accidental Humanist
- The Becker-Posner Blog
- The Huffington Post Politics
- The Huffington Post Pollster
- The Long War Journal
- The Moderate Voice
- The Sandbox
- The UN Post
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- TVNewser
- Watching America
- White House Blog
- Wind Rose Hotel
- Wizbang
- Wonkette
;Recent Comments
- Tom Carter: I remember the Edsel very well, and the much maligned Studebaker, too. I guess one has to...
- Anonymous: It’s sad to see how barbaric these Islamic Palestinians really are. Even sadder is...
- bea woods: My husband served in vietnam in 1968-1969 he was diagnoised with melanoma in 1998 we filed...
- Anonymous: Very good articles. I found myself within your examples of people and their fear of change....
- Tom Carter: This was a truly horrendous mass murder, made much worse by the praise Palestinians (and...
- Tom Carter: I used to teach courses and seminars on business management, and one of the topics...
- Dan Miller: Thanks, Tom. “We report, you decide.” You say, without TOTUS we get the long...
- Tom Carter: Well done, Dan! Clearly a fair and balanced report. It’s obvious, however, that your...
- larry: Are you guys sure this isn’t some sort of deep dark conspiracy?
- Dan Miller: Tom, Caruso? Ha! His weak voice and shoddy choice of music then were as nothing compared...
- Tom Carter: I have to admit, I was disgruntled before I read this brilliant article. It gave me the...
- Dan Miller: Larry No, that would be unfair. However, I am less than totally gruntled. Dan
“If there are 40 million people without health care insurance, why can’t we give each of them a million of Ms. Landrieu’s dollars for health care and save the other 60 million or use it for ticket money to bring our troops home?”
LOL! Thanks Larry!
I just read that Mary Landrieu’s bribe is a lot higher. According to a report by Dana Milbank in The Washington Post, Landrieu said on the Senate floor, bragging about the financial “fix” she had gotten for Louisiana, “it’s not a $100 million fix. It’s a $300 million fix.”
I keep seeing people comparing Landrieu’s payoff to the price we paid for the original Louisiana Purchase in 1803 — $15 million. Given inflation, it doesn’t seem fair to compare her $300 million to the amount paid so long ago. According to one handy website that calculates these things, in today’s dollars we paid $295 million for the Louisiana territory. Hmmm — so she’s still getting more!
Maybe we should try to get our money back….
Regarding all the deal-making Reid is making to get the health care bill passed, Milbank added, “And the big shakedown is yet to occur: That will happen when Reid comes back to his caucus in a few weeks to round up 60 votes for the final passage of the health bill.”
Tom, Briana
Do you see why I tend to go crazy!!
Hey Briana the Rocket Scientist
If we took the ladies 300 million dollars in tens and laid em end to end we’d wind up where??
Tom
Is you saying that old Harry has limitless possibilities??
Aw life under Obama, Harry and Votox Nancy aint it a hoot!!!
No, Larry, I is not saying that old Harry has limitless possibilities. I don’t have any idea what you mean.
Tom
If Harry and friends can “Pony-Up” $300,000.000 to stroke Ms. Landrieu, they most likely can get more taxpayers money to give away to other deserving Democrats. I wonder if these little enticements are figured in as part of the $3.6 trillion this program is projected to cost?
i meant $300,000,000.000
The projected total cost is around $1.3 trillion, according to all the reports I’ve seen. The net costs of the bills are estimated at lower numbers after offsets of various kinds.
Do you have a source for the $3.6 trillion number?
Larry – probably somewhere about 3,000 m. A little under 2 miles.
Tom – as though 1,300,000,000,000.00 is so much better.
Tom, I would suggest recent history of programs like MediCare/MedicAid would demonstrate that $1.3T is a low figure. If it’s what the government is telling, triple it.
Brian and Brianna, I agree with both of you — the mind boggles over numbers of dollars in the trillions. I don’t have any faith in the estimates of cost, either, and I don’t doubt that they’ll go higher. But 3.6 is almost three times higher than 1.3, and I was wondering what the source of that number was.
Just a gentle reminder of how much a trillion dollars is.
If you spent 1 million dollars a day, it would take 2739 years to spend a trillion dollars.